BY GODWIN OBI
Lawyers practicing in Anambra State have warned the federal government against the consequences of disobeying the recent United Nations demand to release the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nazi Nnamdi Kanu from the detention.
UN had recently demanded that Kanu be released from the detention unconditionally as according to the world body, Kanu is only seeking an Independence of his Biafran people and as such his action has not yet warranted such an unlawful detention.
However, the federal government is yet to heed to the UN’s demand at the moment as Kanu is still languishing inside DSS custody, even as government has never made any categorical affirmative or non affirmative statement to that effect.
Three lawyers – Chiefs Clifford Iloegbune Okoye, Maurice Efobi and Sam Chukwukelu who spoke to our correspondent in Onitsha in separate interviews on the development, said Nigerian government should not dismiss the UN’s statement with ignominy the same way they disobey or disregard orders from Nigerian courts and go scot free.
Okoye , a one-time Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, Aguata branch in Anakbra state, declared: “I want to thank the UN for lending its voice to Nigeria’s internal affairs as a member nation under it and Nigeria should be a country where freedom of speech and expression are observed”.
“Kanu is entitled to bail because treason is not a capital offence that will attract death by hanging. I recall the attack in Kanu’s home in Afaraukwu Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia state, by the military”.
“The court has ruled that Kanu did not jump bail because his house was invaded and he had to flee to save his life. The court has equally ruled that his fundamental rights were infringed upon. So, he should be released unconditionally or else UN has several sanctions to impose against Nigeria “.
Chukwukelu, also a Chairman emeritus of the Idemili branch of NBA, said the court which refused to grant Kanu bail recently, should have considered the fact that if Kanu had not escaped alive when the military invaded his house, he would have probably been dead by now and if he had died, he wouldn’t have been alive today to face trial because it is only the living that can face trial not a dead person”.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
